Hunter Strategies LLC logo

Microsoft News Tracker

What's more interesting than observing Microsoft?

December 4, 2006

Gates, Ballmer will not be called by plaintiffs in Iowa antitrust case

Posted by David Hunter at 11:19 AM ET.

David Pitt at the AP:

The attorney representing plaintiffs in one of the few state-level class-action antitrust lawsuits left against Microsoft Corp. announced Monday that she would not call Chairman Bill Gates and CEO Steve Ballmer as witnesses.

Roxanne Conlin won a judge’s ruling prior to the trial that would have forced Gates and Ballmer to travel to Des Moines for direct questioning even though the two executives were expected to testify later in the case when Microsoft presents its defense.

Judge Scott Rosenberg’s ruling indicated that Gates and Ballmer would be required to travel to Des Moines from Washington only once. That would have allowed Microsoft attorneys to question the two men directly — in effect presenting part of their defense in the middle of the plaintiffs’ case.

Conlin released a statement Monday that said the decision was reached to avoid any potential confusion by jurors.


Conlin will be allowed to play a 10-hour unflattering 1998 deposition by Gates from another lawsuit that shows a fidgety, nervous looking chief executive.

I had mentioned the judge’s “one trip” decision here. Gates and Ballmer are still expected to travel to Iowa to testify for the defense.



Filed under Antitrust, Bill Gates, Executives, General Business, Governmental Relations, Legal, Microsoft, Steve Ballmer

Related posts:

 

One Response to “Gates, Ballmer will not be called by plaintiffs in Iowa antitrust case”

  1. Nothing like an antitrust trial for dirty laundry -- Microsoft News Tracker Says:

    [...] From the ongoing Iowa Microsoft antitrust trial – Allchin 2004 email: I’d buy a Mac if I didn’t work for MS: Conlin completed her opening statement at 12:50. Co-counsel Hagstrom began his part of the Plaintiffs’ opening statement. Hagstrom first began with a quote from Nathan Myrhvold, “There is a huge value to a monopoly, and we have the position and skills that it makes sense for us to shoot for it.” Hagstrom continued, “’Huge value to a monopoly’, think about what that means.” Hagstrom reviewed the specific ways Plaintiffs believe that Microsoft harmed Iowans. He emphasized that “competition is good, monopoly is bad.” A good example: [...]

News Search:

Recent Posts:

Daily Digest Email:

Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Categories:

Full category list

Archives:

Archive List

RSS Feed:



HunterStrat Links:

Other:

  • Powered by WordPress.

Advertisements:


 

Related:


Misc: